Még nincs meg az a cikk, amit említettem, de itt egy hasonló:

A cikk (Google Translator-rel fordítva) - ixbt.com cikke alapján a Tianma-féle 10-nél a szubpixelek elosztása eltér a hagyományostól és emiatt veszteség keletkezik:

However, the subpixels themselves are unconventional: in the horizontal direction (in landscape orientation) typical columns appear, but in each of the columns the triads of subpixels are shifted by one subpixel vertically, first upwards, then downwards.

Note that we already met such a subpixel arrangement in the case of Lenovo K3 Note and Sony Xperia Z5 Premium . As a result, the ratio of the columns horizontally to the triads in the vertical direction is 3 to 2, the actual vertical resolution is 1/3 less than the horizontal (hereinafter referred to as the landscape orientation of the screen). That is, the points (triad RGB) on the screen are actually only 2560 by 960. The resolution in any case is very high, and these features of the matrix are almost not apparent when viewing text, photographs and video, but the test worlds are displayed with visible artifacts.

Azaz, a korábbiakkal együtt több szempontból is jobban járt, aki Sharp kijelzős 10-et kapott a kínai Tianma helyett.

[ Szerkesztve ]