"Hot Chips 34 – Intel’s Meteor Lake Chiplets, Compared to AMD’s"
https://chipsandcheese.com/2022/09/10/hot-chips-34-intels-meteor-lake-chiplets-compared-to-amds/

érdekes a két cég eltérő implementálása ..

plusz ami még nekem érdekes .. az Intel a CXL-t mennyire mélyen fogja használni ..
"But Meteor Lake’s iGPU swaps over to iCXL, an internal implementation of Compute Express Link (CXL) that doesn’t use a PHY. ...."

és a cikk összefoglalása:
""""
Going forward, Meteor Lake’s tile strategy should provide Intel with both cost savings and better modularity. Compared to AMD, Intel will be able to employ chiplets in mobile market segments, where tight power constraints prevent AMD from using their more power hungry IFOP links.
However, AMD’s Dragon Range lineup of CPUs designed for the high performance mobile market (55+ watts) is rumored to be using the same chiplet architecture as AMD’s Desktop CPUs. AMD also said in their Analysis Day Press Release that Phoenix Point will also be using a chiplet architecture which AMD is putting in the 15 to 45 watt range. This move to chiplets for even 15 watt TDP CPUs suggests that AMD has a new potential chiplet implementation that could be more similar to Intel’s Meteor Lake. Without any more details than “it uses a chiplet architecture”, I think it’s fair to say that it’s within the realm of possibility and regardless we’ll be exicted to see how AMD implements chiplets on low power mobile chips.
Intel also disaggregates their design more than AMD’s, with separate iGPU and IO extender tiles. AMD packs those into their IO die. Intel thus has more tile reuse potential, though of course we’ll have to wait a few years to see how they take advantage of that.

We’re looking forward to Meteor Lake’s launch, and thank Intel for a very interesting Hot Chips presentation.
""""

Mottó: "A verseny jó!"